| Criteria for assessment |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
| 1. Level of knowledge, understanding and complexity
of ideas |
VH |
H |
M |
L |
NS |
Effective and appropriate exploration of some
of the complexities of the chosen content, demonstrating knowledge
and understanding
 Ability
to evaluate the material researched to reach logical and informed
conclusions about what it means to be a citizen of Australia
and a member of the community
The
overall intellectual quality of the presentation
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2. Have four different types of people been
interviewed |
VH |
H |
M |
L |
NS |
| Give one mark for each different type of person
interviewed |
|
|
|
|
|
| 3. Has the group drawn on a range of MHS experiences
|
VH |
H |
M |
L |
NS |
| The group should draw on community service, the
Red Cross Appeal, ANZAC Day, Millgrove, work experience (if
undertaken this year) and leadership activities (give 4 marks
if 4 of these have been adequately analysed and reflected upon) |
|
|
|
|
|
| 4. Evidence of extensive
research |
VH |
H |
M |
L |
NS |
The group should demonstrate that they have researched
the issue widely
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5. Quality of presentation and group work |
VH |
H |
M |
L |
NS |
Expressive, fluent and appropriate use of language.
Obvious
engagement with audience and ability to use non-verbal aspects
of language (facial and body language and eye contact with audience)
appropriately and effectively.
Ability
to work aeffectively as a group, e.g. collaboration
share ideas, prepare, manage and complete tasks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerical summary for the group
|
|
